Obese patients with atrial fibrillation are more efficiently protected from thrombosis under warfarin or xabans compared to non-obese patients; a systematic review and Meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials.

INTRODUCTION: Recommendations about proper anticoagulation in obese patients, body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m2, are not yet clearly defined. Obese patients were included in randomized controlled trials comparing new anticoagulants (NOACs) with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation or thromboembolism. METHODS: We performed a medline search entering proper criteria and finally 6 post-hoc analysis of RCTs, reporting outcome according to BMI, were included in this meta-analysis. Two major outcomes were considered end points in our meta-analysis; thrombosis, including ischemic cerebral events (transient or not) and venous thrombosis (DVD) /pulmonary embolism (PE) and bleeding, including major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding. RESULTS: In the NOACs treated group, thrombosis occurred less frequently in obese vs non-obese patients; RR and 95 % CI 0,75 (0,58-0,97), p = 0,03, while low heterogeneity was observed (I2= 40 %). In the warfarin treated subgroup there was statistically significant difference with less thrombotic events occurring in the obese vs non-obese patients; RR and (95 % CI) 0,80 (0,66-0,98), p = 0,03, and heterogeneity was low (I2 = 24 %). This protective effect called the obesity paradox is limited to obese patients anticoagulated for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF); RR (95 % CI) was 0,70 (0,58-0,85) p = 0,03 and I2 = 24 %. Bleeding events were similar under both NOACs and warfarin in obese vs non-obese analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Obese patients anticoagulated for NVAF with either standard dose of xabans or INR guided warfarin are more efficiently protected against thrombosis compared to non-obese patients.

Apixaban reduces the risk of major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding compared to warfarin in patients with end stage renal disease; a systematic review and meta-analysis of ten studies.

Optimal anticoagulation in patients with end-stage renal disease ESRD is a matter of debate since these patients are not included in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Evolving data are in favor of apixaban compared to warfarin. METHODS: We extracted data from 2 RCTs, 5 retrospective cohort studies and 3 large data-based studies. Both dosing regimens of apixaban, standard or reduced, were accepted. In most studies characteristics of patients were balanced between arms. Patients with either atrial fibrillation (AF) or venous thromboembolism (VTE) were included. Quality of studies was graded as high and the funnel plot did not detect any publication bias. In total we analyzed the outcome of 6693 ESRD patients treated with apixaban and 19,836 treated with warfarin. Our analysis was performed by using the random effects model. We report our data as Risk Ratio (RR) and associated 95 % confidence interval values (95 %, CI). RESULTS: The RR (95 % CI) of major bleeding was 0.69 (0.57-0.84) p = 0.0002 in favor of apixaban vs warfarin with heterogeneity to be statistically significant I2 63% p = 0.004. Meta-regression analysis with year of publication as moderator shows in bubble plotting that studies published earlier than 2018 were plotted as outliers. The RR (95 % CI) of clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) was 0.74 (0.64-0.87) p = 0.0002 favoring again apixaban. Standard apixaban dose over reduced dose is less hemorrhagic compared to warfarin. Overall, in our study the risk of thrombosis in both arms was statistically non-different. CONCLUSIONS: In our study we observed less hemorrhagic events with apixaban in ESRD patients compared to warfarin.

A randomized, observer-blind, vehicle-control, multi-center clinical investigation for assessing the efficacy and tolerability of a 1% ectoine and hyaluronic acid 0.1%-containing medical device in pediatric patients with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Ectoine is a widespread osmolyte enabling halophilic bacteria to withstand high osmotic stress that has many potential applications ranging from cosmetics to its use as a therapeutic agent. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of ectoine 1% and hyaluronic acid 0.1% containing (EHA) cream with a vehicle cream in children with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis (AD). METHODS: A randomized, controlled, observer-blind, multicenter clinical trial was conducted in children aged 2-18 years, diagnosed with mild-to-moderate AD (SCORAD ≤20). Patients were randomized to either receiving EHA cream or vehicle cream twice daily for 4 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the mean change in objective SCORAD from baseline to the final visit. The secondary outcome measures included the mean change in Investigator's Global Assessment score, patient's judgment of efficacy and patient's assessment of pruritus. Safety of EHA cream was also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 70 patients (35 in each group) were randomized and 57 were included in the final analysis set. Based on SCORAD measurements, patients using EHA cream achieved superior clinical improvement compared to the control group at 28 days (p < .001). EHA cream was also superior to the vehicle cream regarding all secondary outcome measures. Eight (23.5%) patients receiving EHA cream and two (5.7%) patients receiving vehicle cream experienced mild cutaneous adverse events (AEs). CONCLUSIONS: In children 2-18 years old with mild-to-moderate AD, EHA cream was superior to vehicle cream, with minor AEs.

Assessment of the relative effectiveness and tolerability of treatments of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a network meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The relative effectiveness and tolerability of treatments for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is not well understood because few randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) have compared these treatments directly. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the relative effectiveness and tolerability of treatments of T2DM. METHODS: We performed a network meta-analysis of available RCTs with pharmacologic interventions in T2DM and compared antidiabetic drugs and combination regimens with metformin (the reference drug). Glycemic control (proportion achieving HbA1c goal) and tolerability (risk of hypoglycemia) were the primary outcomes of interest. Direct and indirect relative effects (unadjusted) were expressed as odds ratios and 95% CIs. FINDINGS: Eight treatments (glucagon-like peptide-1 [GLP-1] agonists plus metformin, sulfonylureas plus metformin, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 [DPP-4] inhibitors] plus metformin, colesevelan plus metformin, thiazolidinediones plus metformin, meglitinides plus metformin, α-glucosidase inhibitor plus metformin, and rosiglitazone monotherapy) outperformed metformin (direct effects). Triple combinations of GLP-1, thiazolinedione, insulin, metiglinide, or sulfonylureas added to a metformin backbone improved glycemic control (indirect effects). Higher risk of hypoglycemia was noted for sulfonylureas, α-glycosidases, and metiglinides when added to metformin (direct effects). Across indirect effects, only 17% of comparisons yielded less risk of hypoglycemia (70% were worse and 13% were comparable). IMPLICATIONS: Our results point out the relative superiority of 2- and 3-drug combination regimens over metformin and summarize treatment effects and tolerability in a comprehensive manner, which adds to our knowledge regarding T2DM treatment options.

Network analysis of randomized controlled trials in multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) is not yet well-defined. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the relative effectiveness of treatments in MS, we performed a network of multiple-treatments meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for relapsing MS using three main efficacy outcomes: relapse-free patients, patients without disease progression, and patients without magnetic resonance imaging progression. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify English-language articles with RCTs that compared pharmaceutical treatments using the terms multiple sclerosis and randomized controlled trial. All RCTs that involved patients with definite relapsing MS and provided data for calculating the odds ratios for the main outcomes were considered. First, comparative effectiveness relative to placebo was assessed using direct analysis. Then, each therapy was compared with interferon beta-1b (250 µg)* in direct and indirect analyses. Effect sizes were estimated by applying a random-effects model. RESULTS: We identified 4165 titles; after screening, 109 articles were eligible for inclusion. In total, 26,828 patients were included. The network consisted of 145 treatments involving 59 direct comparisons with placebo and 8 direct comparisons with interferon beta-1b (250 µg). Two treatments showed better response compared with placebo (direct analysis) for all three efficacy outcomes: natalizumab (300 mg)(†) and fingolimod (0.5 mg). In comparing treatments with interferon beta-1b (250 µg), the network analysis revealed that no therapy shows better response for all 3 efficacy outcomes and alemtuzumab, 12 and 24 mg, have better response for 2 of the outcomes (relapse-free patients and patients without disease progression). CONCLUSIONS: Although some treatments seem to have better efficacy, the results should be interpreted with caution because the network was dominated by indirect comparisons. Data from the selected studies included in the network cannot be extrapolated beyond them. Large RCTs that make head-to-head comparisons between treatments are needed to draw safe conclusions for the optimal treatment of MS.

Bone mineral density and genetic markers involved in three connected pathways (focal adhesion, actin cytoskeleton regulation and cell cycle): the CUMAGAS-BMD information system.

The focal adhesion, the actin cytoskeleton and cell-cycle are connected pathways and their genes are implicated in the pathogenesis of low BMD. Data from 211 studies that investigated the association between BMD and gene variants involved in these pathways were catalogued in a web-based information system and analyzed. In individual studies, significant association was found for 16 variants in lumbar spine, 11 in femoral neck and 5 in hip. In meta-analysis, significant results were shown for the variants COL1A1 rs1800012 (in lumbar spine and femoral neck), COL1A1 rs1107946 (in lumbar spine), TGFB1 rs1982073 (in femoral neck and hip) and TGFB1 rs1800469 (in lumbar spine).